|
SEC.
JAMES BAKER: Good afternoon. Ladies and Gentlemen, let me
say it's been a pleasure to have received Ambassador Shoval
this afternoon. And we have had the opportunity to discuss
the question of absorption aid with Israel.
The Ambassador has presented me with a letter request from
Prime Minister Shamir pointing out the need of the State of
Israel for assistance in absorbing Soviet Jewish ZmigrZs
requesting, in effect, guarantees from the United States in
the aggregate amount of ten billion dollars -- two billion
dollars per year over five years. I pointed out to the
Ambassador that we strongly support the provisions of
absorption assistance to Israel, that we had worked very
long and hard over the past two and a half years, or so, to
encourage Soviet Jewish immigration, (even ?) in the days of
the old Soviet Union. We are committed to this.
We are, however, concerned with respect to the exact timing
and need a little time to consider a request of this
magnitude and to look at the details and the specifics. We
have agreed that we will stay in touch. I will have, of
course, the opportunity to discuss this -- hopefully -- in
some detail with Prime Minister Shamir when I visit --
(inaudible) -- during the course of my next visit.
AMB. ZALMAN SHOVAL: (Inaudible) -- of the government of
Israel for the loan guarantees. I have added that at present
we are grateful, thankful to the United States and I think
-- (inaudible) We certainly have the same aims in mind as
the United States government has with regard to the --
Q: Is the delay a problem for Israel?
AMB. SHOVAL: Well, of course delay is a problem because the
immigrants are coming in. We have very severe economic
problems and it's no secret that we need this money quite
urgently. It is a problem.
Q: Will it affect Israeli participation in the peace
conference?
AMB. SHOVAL: We have always stated we are against linkage
and we are not going to take -- (inaudible) -- anything of
any importance. (Inaudible.)
SEC. BAKER: Let me say the same thing for the United States.
And when we say we want some time to look at this, and when
we request the Congress to consider a delay of no more than
120 days to give peace a chance, we're not linking this.
What we're saying -- what we're trying to do is to avoid a
controversy, to avoid a conflict, to avoid a debate that we
would worry might be very divisive at a time -- as the
Ambassador said -- when we share the same objectives with
respect to the creation of a viable peace plan.
So, we have had a very, very good meeting. I anticipate you
will probably see such beginning (before ?) I get to Israel.
Our -- (inaudible) -- again to Soviet Jewish immigration and
to absorption aid for Israel is firm.
The question of timing is one that I'm quite certain we will
be able to amicably work out and I look forward to having
the opportunity to discuss it with Prime Minister Shamir
when I get to Jerusalem. And I'm delighted -- (inaudible).
Q: Mr. Secretary, Congressman Schumer said today that your
holding a club over Israel's head. Would you respond to
that?
SEC. BAKER: Well, I simply do not agree with that. We're not
doing anything of the kind. I've just told you that I've had
-- that I had two very, very good conversations with Prime
Minister Shamir just as my vacation ended. I'm looking
forward to seeing him next week.
We're not holding any club at all. We are simply saying that
we would like to have time to consider this rather
significant request, to consider the issues that surround
and to agree on the exact timing. We have not, and will not,
mount an effort or a campaign against the principle of
absorption aid to Soviet Jewish immigrants.
Q: Mr. Secretary, Senator Mack says that Israel's
humanitarian needs should not be held hostage to Arab
demands. This is the first full exchange we've gotten --
(inaudible). Is your desire for delaying based on concerns
that the Arabs don't want to see Israel housing people, and
you'd rather not have to deal with that until you've got the
peace conference nailed down?
SEC. BAKER: No, it's not that, Barry. It's because I don't
presume to speak for all of the Arab governments with
respect to what their views are, or are not, concerning the
specific issues.
It's just that if this package is to move at this particular
time I think that it would create conflict rather than avoid
conflict. Both of us want to avoid conflict.
I know what your job is, and I respect it. It's to drive
wedges occasionally and to create good stories and to get
some good quotes. And I must say that I have been very, very
heartened to see the statements, frankly, that have come
from the government of Israel because they must have
disappointed you badly.
Q: Well, their -- (inaudible) -- can't get a fair fight --
SEC. BAKER: No, no, no, no, no.
Q: No, when you say --
SEC. BAKER: The statement -- hopefully the statements that
have come from the United States government are
disappointing to you as well. (Laughs)
Q: We're not -- (inaudible) -- conflict. We're trying to
understand how this would undercut your effort. And, so far,
the suggestion I get is that there would be turmoil. There
would be -- you know -- a distraction. But we're wondering
if it's linked to Arab aid in any way.
SEC. BAKER: What we don't want to have happen is to -- for
any reason -- lose what might be the best opportunity we've
had for peace in a long, long time. And what we've said is:
"Let's give peace a chance," even if it's only for 120 days.
Now, we've had some good discussions here today with respect
to these issues of our budget -- where does this come from,
how much does it actually mean in terms of (hits ?) to the
United States budget, timing and a whole host of other
things. I hope we're going to continue to have these
discussions in the future, and I think we will -- so that we
can work this out in a way that meets the needs and the
common objectives of Israel and the United States.
Q: Ambassador Shoval, do you agree with that statement that
the United States is not holding a club over the head of
Israel?
AMB. SHOVAL: I would just certainly like to add that we
would definitely not like the Arabs to get the wrong signal
from -- (inaudible). But I believe that -- (inaudible) --
we're requesting makes it very clear that there will be no
linkage between Arab demands -- if there are any Arab
demands -- and America's commitment to the absorption of the
immigrants -- immigrants into Israel. And this, I believe,
is the Secretary's and our common aim.
SEC. BAKER: That's right. Thank you all very much.
AMB. SHOVAL: Thank you. |