|
ANNOUNCER:
From Washington, Crossfire. On the left, Mike Kinsley. On
the right, Oliver North. Tonight, Back to the Table. In the
crossfire, Abdel Raouf El-Reedy, Egyptian Ambassador to the
United States. And Zalman Shoval, Israeli Ambassador to the
United States.
MIKE KINSLEY: Good evening. Welcome to Crossfire.
Palestinian negotiators arrived in Washington today to
resume peace talks with Israel. The Palestinians had
threatened to stay away over Israel's decision to expel 12
Arabs from the occupied territories. The expulsions are in
retaliation for the killing of a Jewish settler in the Gaza
Strip. Got that so far? OK. On Monday, the United Nations
Security Council voted to, quote, 'strongly condemn the
Israeli expulsion of the Palestinians.' The United States
supported that condemnation and the Palestinians then agreed
to resume the talks. Meanwhile, another struggle is about to
resume over $ 10 billion of loan guarantees that Israel
wants from the United States. The Bush administration wants
assurances that the money will not be spent to build Jewish
settlements in the occupied territories. I hope that's all
clear. Over to you, Ollie.
OLIVER NORTH: Mr. Ambassador, since Sadat the Egyptian
government's really the only Arab government really trusted
by the Israelis. How long is it going to be before the
Mubarak government steps up to its real responsibilities and
brings its Arab brothers to the point where they do the
logical first thing for a successful peace talk, recognition
of Israel?
ABDEL RAOUF EL-REEDY, Egyptian Ambassador to U.S.: We are
doing all what we can. As a matter of fact, Egypt played a
critical role in initiating this peace process because we
are convinced that the region is at a crossroads and what we
would like to do is to have this peace process as a vehicle
to bring a new era where the Middle East will have a new
region of order which would fit with the international
order, the new international order, but in order to have
this in place, you have to have sense of justice, sense of
fairness. You have to have the Palestinians, who have
suffered for so long, you have to have them achieve and
attain their own basic rights --
NORTH: You've said all the right things --
AMB. EL-REEDY: -- have self determination. You have self
determination for every people in the world and I think the
Palestinian people are equally entitled to have right to
have self determination.
NORTH: I don't believe there's anybody at this table that's
going to dispute the right of the Palestinian people to have
their own homeland.
AMB. EL-REEDY: Self determination.
NORTH: But you've just said all the right things. Here you
are in the role of the honest broker.
AMB. EL-REEDY: Yes.
NORTH: Can't you get your Arab brothers to the point where
the logical first step, recognition for Israel, just like
you gave --
AMB. EL-REEDY: That's my --
NORTH: -- takes us there to begin with?
AMB. EL-REEDY: Recognition of Israel is a legitimate point
and the Arabs have accepted 242 which speaks about the
recognition of Israel, but not only recognition of Israel --
you have to have the recognition of the other important
principles, land, the return of the land, the right of the
Palestinian people to self determination. These are very --
NORTH: It seems to me we're stuck where we were --
AMB. EL-REEDY: It's not only -- it is recognition, of
course. This is a legitimate point with which we have -- we
are in peace with Israel. President Mubarak called Prime
Minister Shamir the other day on the phone and we have --
bilaterally we have very good relations and --
NORTH: How about reaching out and bringing some of your
brothers in?
AMB. EL-REEDY: Exactly, exactly. Our brothers, some of our
brothers arrived today. However, the other brothers are
arriving tomorrow. We are going to meet all in a
multilateral negotiations for this, a new era, a new era.
KINSLEY: Ambassador Shoval, you're usually on my side over
here. Tonight only you're over there. So, let me ask you --
I want to ask you a little bit about this U.N. resolution
condemning Israel which your government is very resentful
of. A settler, a Jewish settler is killed on the Gaza Strip.
The Israeli government expels 12 Palestinians. Is there any
evidence that these 12 Palestinians were involved in killing
that settler?
ZALMAN SHOVAL, Israeli Ambassador to U.S.: These 12
Palestinians were going to be deported. They have a right to
appeal to the Israeli supreme court. There's, too, due legal
process. They are among the ring leaders of three terrorists
organizations who are involved in killings, not just the
settler in the Gaza Strip, but there was a woman a month
ago, there was a man six weeks ago. We have not done
anything. We have not deported anyone but, you know, there's
a limit. It's not a retaliation.
KINSLEY: It has nothing to do with the killing of this
settler?
AMB. SHOVAL: Yes, it's a preventive measure in order to
prevent further killings and there is our duty as a power,
as an occupying power even, not just as the Israeli
government, to prevent violence. Let me say perhaps --
KINSLEY: Let me ask --
AMB. SHOVAL: Just one thing.
KINSLEY: Sure.
AMB. SHOVAL: You know, in conjunction with what we said --
with what you said before, President Sadat came to Israel --
AMB. EL-REEDY: Yes.
AMB. SHOVAL: -- without conditions. He broke the
psychological barrier. The Palestinians and the other Arabs
don't even want to communicate with us at this time. You
know that.
AMB. EL-REEDY: You know that they have been there.
AMB. SHOVAL: And that is the big difference. I'm trying to
get --
AMB. EL-REEDY: They have been communicating with you --
AMB. SHOVAL: Well, not between meetings --
KINSLEY: All right. I want to -- this is getting too palsy.
I want to get back to this resolution and these expulsions
one more time. You said that these are occupied territories
and you were acting in your military capacity --
AMB. SHOVAL: Yes, that's all right.
KINSLEY: Well, that goes to the kernel of the problem. How
can Israel have it both ways? If they're occupied
territories, they're a legitimate subject for negotiation
and potential return --
AMB. SHOVAL: Yeah, that's what we say.
KINSLEY: If -- that is not what your government says.
AMB. SHOVAL: Oh, yes, it is exactly.
KINSLEY: Your government accepts the principle of land for
peace?
AMB. SHOVAL: No, our government says this is disputed
territory. We say it's ours. The Palestinians say it's
theirs. OK --
KINSLEY: Does your government say that it's prepared to
negotiate about the future sovereignty over those
territories?
AMB. SHOVAL: Our government says we want to have
unconditional negotiations, the Palestinian side can raise
anything they want, we can raise anything we want.
KINSLEY: Are you prepared to give some of that land back for
peace?
AMB. SHOVAL: What do you mean back? They never had it.
AMB. EL-REEDY: What do you mean?
KINSLEY: Give it --
AMB. EL-REEDY: What do you mean? It's their territory.
AMB. SHOVAL: There never was a Palestinian --
KINSLEY: All right. Forget a Palestinian -- are you prepared
to give it to any Arab --
AMB. SHOVAL: Legally, historically, morally we have -- I
don't say it's all ours but we say we have at least as good
a claim as anybody else. The negotiations are going to
settle whose land that is.
NORTH: Let me -- before we dissolve.
AMB. EL-REEDY: That land belongs to the people who live
there. Let's --
AMB. SHOVAL: But we live there before and we live there much
longer --
AMB. EL-REEDY: But these people have been living there and
they are entitled to have their own land.
NORTH: Giving up land for peace sounds very simple --
AMB. EL-REEDY: And this is one of the basic principles upon
which Security Council Resolution 242 which is the basis of
the settlement and Ambassador Shoval, my good friend,
referred to the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty. How was this
possible? It was possible because Israel returned all the
Egyptian occupied territory --
NORTH: That's not the real issue. The real issue is trust.
AMB. SHOVAL: Sinai was never ours.
AMB. EL-REEDY: OK.
AMB. SHOVAL: And it was never ours --
AMB. EL-REEDY: And Palestine belongs to the Palestinians.
KINSLEY: Are you saying that the West Bank is yours legally?
AMB. SHOVAL: We are Palestinians as much as they are. We
were there much before they were.
NORTH: Let's not go back to biblical history. Let me just
ask the real question. It's not really an issue of land. The
real issue is a matter of trust. Suppose land is given up.
How can the Israelis, the average Israeli in the street
really be sure that moderate Arab leaders like Mubarak, even
the modern Palestinian leaders, are going to be able to
control the most radical elements that threaten the very
existence of Israel?
AMB. EL-REEDY: Of course we will have -- everybody will have
to make that commitment. We will be part of the agreement.
The United States, other powers will be there, and in order
to have trust, you have to have fairness. You know, these
Palestinians have been living there all their lives,
generation after generation. When you deny them every right,
when you -- and this practice of deportation -- deportation
is one of the most abhorred practices ever.
KINSLEY: Let me ask Ambassador Shoval about that very point.
AMB. EL-REEDY: When you treat people like that --
KINSLEY: Quiet --
AMB. EL-REEDY: -- how can trust come?
KINSLEY: You're going to get your answer. It is very odd,
isn't it, this form of punishment of expulsion? I mean,
these are not people who came to these territories. These
are people who were there. Now, if they've done something
wrong, try them, put them in jail, but what is this business
about uprooting them from where they spent all their lives
and dumping them in some country they've never lived in?
AMB. SHOVAL: Well, first of all we don't dump them, we send
them to another Arab country. We send them really to people
who are their own people, that's number one. Number two, if
we would have put them on trial -- and we may one day, like
in this country for instance. How would this country would
have fared with them? How would it treat them? Put them on
trial, OK. How are they going to treat in this country a
killer? They're probably going to execute them. Israel does
not want to have the death sentence. We are not going to
execute, we don't want to create martyrs. We think it's more
humane-it's also more effective-to deport those people into
another Arab country until peace arrives. These are not
civilian people, these are not peaceful citizens, these are
terrorist leaders and let me just tell you --
KINSLEY: Very briefly.
AMB. SHOVAL: -- that just the day before yesterday this
peaceful organization, al-Fatah, Arafat's organization
issued an announcement calling for increased violence,
saying we are against a political settlement --
KINSLEY: All right. I've got to cut both of you off.
AMB. EL-REEDY: How can --
KINSLEY: I've got to cut both of you off and --
AMB. EL-REEDY: I have to say that state deportation and
expulsion of people are practices which are never acceptable
by --
KINSLEY: OK, all right, excuse me, I've got to cut you both
off --
AMB. EL-REEDY: -- civilized people.
KINSLEY: I've got to cut you off.
AMB. EL-REEDY: Put them on trial or --
KINSLEY: We're not going to deport you but I'm going to
quiet you down for a moment. We're going to take a break.
These guys will keep on talking. We're going to take a
break. When we come back, we'll talk about those $ 10
billion of loan guarantees.
[Commercial break]
KINSLEY: Welcome back to Crossfire. Those Middle East peace
talks between Israel and its Arab neighbors resume next week
in Washington. Here with a little preview of the action
we've got the Israeli ambassador to the United States Zalman
Shoval and the Egyptian ambassador Abdel Raouf El-Reedy, but
I want to go back to Ambassador Shoval and talk about this
question of the loan guarantees. The United States opposes
the building of Jewish settlements in the occupied
territories. It's our position that they are -- they harm
the peace process. That may be right, that may be wrong, but
it's our government's position. Regarding these $ 10 billion
of loan guarantees that Israel would like, we say, we are
absolutely thrilled that all these Russian Jews are coming
to Israel, we want to help settle them but we are not
prepared to finance a policy that we disagree with. We'll
give you the guarantees-we're not giving money, it's just
guarantees-but we won't do it if you insist on using the
money to pursue a policy we disagree with. Now, why is that
unreasonable?
AMB. SHOVAL: It's perfectly reasonable. We don't have any
problem with that, we're not going to use one cent of those
funds in the territories across the green line. We haven't
used any of these funds before across the green line. As a
matter of fact, 1.2 percent of the new immigrants have
settled in the territories, that's all.
KINSLEY: Yes. That's a little disingenuous. The government
announced a couple days ago that two-thirds of the housing
-- government's housing budget for next year --
AMB. SHOVAL: Out of a total of how much?
KINSLEY: Well, I don't -- just a second, let me finish the
question.
AMB. SHOVAL: OK.
KINSLEY: Two-thirds of the government's housing budget is
going to go to building in the occupied territories. Now, a
dollar is a dollar, a shekel is a shekel. You can move them
around; if we give you this ability to raise this money, it
enables you to spend other money on other things.
AMB. SHOVAL: Well, first of all what the government
announced is 5000 houses, that's all, which is not a great
deal because --
KINSLEY: How many people --
AMB. SHOVAL: Well, Israel -- KINSLEY: Four people in a
family, that's 20,000; there's only 100,000 there now.
AMB. SHOVAL: Let's hope they're bigger families but Israel
for instance has built this year alone 125,000 housing units
in Israel itself, so 5000 is really not very significant,
but I repeat. We are not going to use any of these funds and
if anything can be worked out between us and the Israeli
government to assure that in the future, we'll work it out.
NORTH: Mr. Ambassador, Mike likes to talk in terms of
billions and point at Israel. My government forgave your
government $ 7 billion in debt and yet since that time it
appears to me and I think to many other Americans that the
Egyptian government is moving further toward the radicals,
people like -- embracing --
AMB. EL-REEDY: What do you mean?
NORTH: Well, the embrace for --
AMB. EL-REEDY: You're looking for -- your information, Mr.
North, is very, very regrettable, that you are saying --
NORTH: Mr. Ambassador, I think we've all seen the picture of
the embrace given by --
AMB. EL-REEDY: I'm sorry, I am sorry, Mr. North. I am sorry
that you are not saying anything that is -- can be qualified
as truthful. Egypt is a pillar of peace and moderation in
that region and let me --
NORTH: How about the embrace for Qaddafi?
AMB. EL-REEDY: What do you mean? Libya is our neighbor and
we --
NORTH: But that doesn't make them necessarily a good
neighbor?
AMB. EL-REEDY: What are you supposed to do, go and fight --
AMB. SHOVAL: I think President Mubarak --
AMB. EL-REEDY: I did not interrupt you --
AMB. SHOVAL: -- met Mr. Arafat today.
AMB. EL-REEDY: Yes --
AMB. SHOVAL: Ah, Arafat is Saddam Hussein's ally.
AMB. EL-REEDY: Look --
NORTH: Please.
AMB. SHOVAL: I'm sorry.
AMB. EL-REEDY: Libya -- I did not interrupt you.
AMB. SHOVAL: You're right. AMB. EL-REEDY: Libya is our
neighbor. What do you want us to do? To have -- to go and
fight or try to find solutions to whatever problems. Let me
just refer to one point about settlements because this idea
-- the real issues. The question of settlements in the
occupied territories, if there is any very serious problem,
obstacle to peace, a grave violation of international law,
it is this question.
NORTH: I would dispute your analysis.
AMB. EL-REEDY: And I'm very sorry to hear my dear friend
Ambassador Shoval say that this is just a question of few
people, few -- the reports which are being published today
in the Washington Post, everywhere that there is a massive
building of settlements and this is a serious -- a serious
impediment to peace. The people in Palestine -- look, the
Palestinians have lived for the last 2000 years in the whole
of Palestine.
AMB. SHOVAL: There were no Palestinians even 200 years ago.
AMB. EL-REEDY: What do you mean? There have been
Palestinians for the last 2000 years.
AMB. SHOVAL: When I was a child there were no Palestinians.
KINSLEY: All right.
AMB. EL-REEDY: I'm sorry that you are denying the existence
of a whole people, Mr. Ambassador.
NORTH: Let me get back to the question I asked. I want to
know about trust.
AMB. EL-REEDY: These settlements are --
NORTH: How does the embrace for Qaddafi build the trust
that's necessary for this to work?
AMB. EL-REEDY: If you want to have trust, you should stop
practices such as building settlements in the Palestinian
land --
KINSLEY: OK.
AMB. EL-REEDY: You have to stop practices such as
deportation of people.
KINSLEY: All right.
AMB. EL-REEDY: Relations between neighboring countries
should be normal relations.
KINSLEY: Let me ask Ambassador Shoval something --
AMB. EL-REEDY: Should be normal relations --
AMB. SHOVAL: We are very happy with our relationship with
Egypt.
KINSLEY: All right. That's very sweet --
NORTH: As a neighbor.
AMB. SHOVAL: As a neighbor.
KINSLEY: Now, suppose the Israeli government is prepared to
offer the most extreme degree of autonomy to the
Palestinians living in the occupied territories as part of
some solution. Why should Palestinians, Palestinian Arabs,
alone among all the peoples of the world have to settle for
autonomy in someone else's country rather than citizenship
in a country of their own?
AMB. SHOVAL: Because this is disputed land where
historically two peoples have a claim. I'm even going as far
as saying two people have two legitimate claims. The only
way to cope with that is in some sort of interim solution.
Now, the interim solution is to give the Palestinian
minority in our country the way to run their own affairs in
most walks of life but not in ways which would affect our
security.
KINSLEY: But the net result is that all the Jews in the
Middle East -- that's not true of course, there are Jews in
the Arab countries who don't have -- have it very well, but
the Jews in Israel will all have citizenship, not autonomy
but citizenship, whereas the Palestinians would be left with
something short of citizenship and that does not exist
anywhere else in the world.
AMB. SHOVAL: Well, it exists in many parts of the world.
Look at the Kurds and look at other minorities.
KINSLEY: Well, those aren't democracies.
AMB. SHOVAL: That's right.
KINSLEY: You're not going to compare yourselves to the
Iraqis.
AMB. SHOVAL: That's right.
NORTH: We're going to give the Ambassador the last word on
this one this time because we have to take a break and when
we come back we'll talk about some of the worst case
scenarios if the Middle East peace process doesn't succeed.
[Commercial break]
NORTH: Can we anticipate that if this process breaks down,
if it doesn't work-what started in Madrid is a noble
experiment in peace-if it doesn't work are we going to see a
resurgence of the kind of radical terrorism that we --
besieged us all in the eighties? Are we going to see a
growth of what we're already seeing in Algeria with the
Islamic radical fundamentalists?
AMB. EL-REEDY: President Nixon said in his new book and
yesterday and he is warning exactly on this point and he is
saying this is the right moment to make peace and if you do
not achieve peace at this juncture, you are going to have a
resurgence of extremism and fundamentalism on both sides, on
both sides.
NORTH: How about you?
AMB. SHOVAL: Let's be optimistic. The Palestinians have
wasted 40 years with regard to peace. We have a chance now,
we are waiting for them. Let's talk secret, concrete, real
talks and achieve peace.
KINSLEY: I'm sorry --
AMB. EL-REEDY: And give them justice and fairness.
KINSLEY: I'm sorry you said secret 'cause I wanted to ask
you and I'm going to ask you anyway, what practically can we
expect in the new few days? First of all, can we expect the
Israelis and the Palestinians, Jordanians to settle this
question of who sits where and at least go into the same
room?
AMB. SHOVAL: I certainly hope so. If the Palestinians get
over these procedurals we can get down to substance. We were
prepared to get down to substance the last time. They
refused. I hope they have changed their minds. If we can do
that, we will make progress this time.
AMB. EL-REEDY: The Palestinians are most eager, more than
anybody else - -
AMB. SHOVAL: They should be.
AMB. EL-REEDY: -- to change their status from people under
foreign occupation --
AMB. SHOVAL: They should be.
AMB. EL-REEDY: -- into people who have their own rights and
they do not want to waste time. I know their position very
well.
AMB. SHOVAL: Well, they came late.
AMB. EL-REEDY: They are very eager. These have been
procedural problems which maybe you have one point, they
have their own point, very important for them, but what they
are eager about is to go on with the peace and to change
their conditions from a people under foreign occupation into
a people who have their own rights in their own land.
AMB. SHOVAL: Well, we offer them peace. We offer them home
rule.
AMB. EL-REEDY: OK.
AMB. SHOVAL: We offer them autonomy.
KINSLEY: All right.
AMB. EL-REEDY: Offer them --
KINSLEY: You guys --
AMB. EL-REEDY: -- also their land --
AMB. SHOVAL: Let's come to the table --
KINSLEY: You guys, go -- you can settle it after the show.
We'll be pleased to announce the results. Thank you,
Ambassador Shoval, Ambassador El-Reedy.
AMB. EL-REEDY: Thank you.
KINSLEY: Lieutenant Colonel North and I will negotiate peace
in the Middle East and elsewhere in just a moment.
[Commercial break]
NORTH: Mike, you and I probably wouldn't agree on much but I
think we're one on this issue that what's been started in
the Middle East is a noble experiment in trying to achieve
something that's eluded the world for 50 years. We have a
chance --
KINSLEY: Sounds safe enough.
NORTH: We have a chance now and hopefully it's not just
someone's effort to give Jim Baker the Nobel Prize for
peace. I think one of the points made here this evening that
if -- this may well be the last chance and if it doesn't
work now we face rising Islamic fundamentalism, the growth
of terrorism and the very real possibility of the PRC and
the North Koreans helping arm people with nukes.
KINSLEY: Well, that's fine. The question is then, are you
prepared to see the United States, our country, not merely
be a middle man but put pressure on both sides to push them
along because that's the only way I think you're going to
get real movement in these talks.
NORTH: One of the best middle men was sitting here. The only
government in the region that's trusted by both sides, the
Egyptians.
KINSLEY: A free ad for the Egyptian ambassador. From the
left, I'm Mike Kinsley. Good night for Crossfire.
NORTH: And from the right, I'm Oliver North. Join us again
tomorrow for another edition of Crossfire. |